The Zone Phenomenon - A Philosophical Explanation

Introduction(C) explains that from what (A) has told him thus far
The purpose of this essay is to explain the "zone" orhe clearly needs to adopt a right mindfulness approach
"flow" phenomenon experienced by athletes whento tennis. Right mindfulness involves a focused
playing sport. Athletes experiencing, 'zone phenomenon'awareness towards present circumstances. By
has been well documented by sports psychologistsfocusing on the immediate one can begin to minimize
and other professionals who have studied sportingunpleasant experiences. One can change the
non-sporting related zone experiences. This article iscircumstances by clearing the mind and thinking about
concerned with sport and will claim that a lack ofnothing. The mind has a habit of chatting away to itself,
reflective awareness on the part of professionalespecially if we are in a stressful situation. The chatter
athletes while playing sport will invariably lead to a zoneis even louder when things are going badly for us. (A)
or flow response.acknowledges that he can relate to this.
Reflective awareness for the purposes of this article(C) explains that the challenge for mindfulness
means to think about what one is experiencing.meditation is to view these thoughts as being totally
Reflective awareness can also be referred to as airrelevant to what is happening at the moment. If we
'what it is like?' experience. The explanation will bereally want to we can let these thoughts evaporate
done by way of comparing two arguments. The firstinto nothingness. If these thoughts are fleeting and
argument presented is the 'Philosophical Zombie' andchange from time to time why do we persist to hang
the second is the 'Tennis Playing Zombie'.on to them? What is required is a concentrated focus
Before comparing any arguments it is important toon an object whereby we observe the object as
establish what 'reflective awareness' or 'what it is like?'having no intrinsic qualities. In other words, we try to
experiences are.This is because such experiences areexperience the object in the immediate present. (C)
the basis of any zombie argument. 'What it is like?'explains that this is like staring into a fire and becoming
experiences are those experiences which create aentranced by the flickering flame, we become
unique mind events or personal thoughts. In otherentranced by the changing nature of the flame. A
words, the physical brain generates non-physical mindflickering flame appears totally chaotic therefore it is
events as a consequence of operating in a physicalour fascination with the fleeting present state of the
world.flame that makes us concentrate on it. (A) protests
Zombies on the other hand are able to by-pass thesethat this is of no use to him while playing tennis.
types of human thoughts They interact with their(C) explains that no formal meditation procedure is
environment in a type of action/reaction system. Thisrequired. All (A) should be doing is concentrating on the
is not unlike some of the state of the art experimentalimmediate present. This is can be as simple as
robots which have sensorimotor circuits which giveconcentrating on one's breathing patterns. It is also
them sensation and perception. This allows them topossible to turn our attention outward towards the
perform mundane tasks which make use of feedbacktennis environment and focus on a single object such
and analysis systems. A zombie or a robots approachas the net. This will help clear the mind of all thoughts
to a task which they are capable of is alwaysbecause we are passing no judgments on what we
necessary and sufficient. Therefore, playing "in theare focusing or concentrating on.
zone" means as far as humanly possible to playAgain, (A) protests that this is still of now value while
without reflective awareness. In essence, to play like aplaying. Tennis is a fast moving game which requires
zombie.rapid shifts in terms of focus. We need to look at our
The philosophical zombie argument is found in manyopponent, look at the ball then look at the ball hitting the
articles and journals on philosophy. The philosophicalracquet. We also need to look where are are running
zombie is a fictitious creatures used in thoughton the court. Just staring at the net makes no sense
experiments to draw out the distinction betweenat all.
automated action from conscious thought. While(C) suggests that (A) tries an alternative to just
zombies are fictional creatures which lackfocusing on one single object. (C) knows that passive
consciousness, the tennis playing zombie is a realmeditation practiced with an unfocused gaze can lead
character; more specifically they are professionalto the mind becoming defused. This is somewhat
athletes who have 'philosophical zombie experiences'like,'staring into space' The idea is that the mind cannot
while in the zone. As there is no precedent for acope with an overload of visual input. An unfocused
tennis-playing zombie it will be explained in greatergaze forces the mind to try recognize every object
detail. Both arguments will be treated in turn.within a wide visual field. If (A) stares at the net with an
The Philosophical Zombie Argumentunfocused gaze he will notice not only the net but
A philosophical zombie is an animated imaginary beingeverything within his peripheral vision. The result is a
that is like us in every way, except in its inability tonumbing of the thought process for the duration of the
undergo conscious experience. The philosophicalgaze if (A) can make an effort to notice everything at
zombie is the work of various schools of philosophy,once.Any chattering in the mind would immediately
who created it to highlight the nature of consciousnesscease. An unfocused gaze will lead to everything
and its relationship to the physical world. It can alsolooking slightly fuzzy in visual terms because there is
explore the possibility of how other creatures, sentientno one object of focus, we are trying look at as many
or otherwise, might think.things as possible all at once. (C) is of course aware
As far as the zombie argument is concerned it isthat when playing tennis (A) needs to focus on the ball
assumed that zombies, if the existed, they would notor his opponent, but he thinks that if (A) gives this
be able to appreciate such things as beautiful sunsets,aspect of the game as little time as possible it will
winning a tennis match, or drinking fine wine. It iswork. When (A) is hitting the ball over the net or
important to note that appreciating such sensations isreceiving the ball he will automatically focus on the ball;
very different to simply having them. It is assumed thatno conscious effort in this regard is required. However,
all zombies can experience sunsets in the same way,as soon as there is a break in play between points he
but the subtle difference lies in the claim they wouldwill attempt to give the whole tennis environment equal
not appreciate such experiences because they arevisual status once again. His aim should be to create a
incapable of subjective consciousness. In other words,mind that is blank, or as close to lacking consciousness
they cannot have 'What it is like?' experiences.as possible, for as long a possible.
If we were to call our zombie an 'abomination of(C) thinks that wide use of the gazing technique will
nature' he may act hurt and offended, but in reality helead to, 'what it is like?' experiences being severely
would be neither. He cannot actually be hurt orlimited. There should be no what it is like to hit a winner,
offended because his emotions are a by-product oflose a important point or play someone you don't like;
the physical process. Zombies are epiphenomenalist;all experiences will have a similar character about
their thoughts and feelings are a by-product of thethem. There will be nothing to reflect upon only
brain. A thermometer reading 100 degs. C., whenconcentration on a process. After the match it will be
placed in boiling water is a by-product of water boiling.interesting to get (A's) opinion on what it was like to
The thermometer, regardless of what it reads has noplay this way.
effect on the temperature of water. In a similar fashion(A's) account might read something like this: " I didn't
a zombie reacting to events in the physical world mayhave any 'what it is like?' experiences- it all seemed
produce thoughts and feelings, but these in no waythe same". When asked how long he had been playing
determines his present or future actions.for, his response might be, "It's difficult to say how
Unlike zombies, humans take their thoughts seriously.much time I spend out on the court. Time seemed to
Our thoughts usually initiate some type of action, weslow down, or was irrelevant in any case. I had almost
can ponder them and sometimes they can drive us toa loss of self-consciousness, because I was fully
distraction. We often find it difficult to ignore them. Justimmersed in what I was doing". And how did that feel?
how seriously we take our thoughts and how they"It was quite pleasurable; it was like I was thinking just
affect our actions can be explored through the tennisone thought-''play the entire time''. How would you rate
playing zombie.your game? "the whole experience was more
The Tennis Playing Zombie is not an imaginary being; itobjective than subjective, it was a bit like being a
is a modern, elite sportsperson who has an uncannytennis-playing zombie..."
knack of playing to the best of their ability nearly everySuch a recount of playing tennis is very similar to what
time they step out onto the court. Unlike theprofessional sportspeople classify as playing "in the
philosophical zombie they are sentient beings, but likezone" or having a "flow experience". Now (A) has a
the philosophical zombie they operate on automatavery convoluted way of getting into the zone but
because they don't have, 'what it is like?' to play tennisprofessional sportspeople are able to slip into the zone
experiences while on court.easily and at will. They have to- their livelihood depends
All elite tennis players have awareness when they areon it.
playing. When they walk out onto the court it would beA study by (Young, in 1999) confirmed the findings of
hard to ignore the crowd or the sense of occasion,earlier studies by (Cooper, 1998 and Loeher,1995) that
and in some cases this may lead to a realization of, 'I"the zone" or "flow experience" is a universal
know what it is like to be nervous'. It also goes withoutphenomenon, regardless of the sports involved. When
saying that it is necessary to be aware of what isit comes to playing in the zone, there is no 'what it is
happening on court while playing. All players knowlike to play tennis?', 'what it is like to play basketball?' or
what it is like to hit a winner or loose a crucial point.'what it is like to play any other sport?' All sports have
The problem for most players is that while awarenessan uncanny similarity when it comes to experiencing
is a general state of being it is sometimes difficult tothem in the zone.
choose what to and what not to reflect on. However,Universal zone experiences are a case for " the
it will be shown that it is not only possible not to reflectzombie experience", how else can we explain such a
on anything, it is actually best sporting practice.similarity of experiences regardless of the sport or the
Zombies are aware of what is happening aroundprofessionals involved? Philosophical Zombies
them, but don't reflect on thoughts and experiences.experience the world in the same way just as
All elite players know that negative emotions canprofessional sportspeople experience sport in the
affect performance, while others have recognised thatsame way. Sportspeople express a strong affinity
too much positive emotion can also negatively affectwith what they are doing. There is an awareness that
performance, if allowed to linger on too long. Theythe mind and the environment are merging into a
seem to instinctively know that taking their thoughtsreciprocal relationship (automatic by-passing of the
too seriously while on court can stop them fromcognitive process). This is because athletes are
producing their best.operating without the need for reflective awareness.
The ideal mental state for an elite performer is toThis is one explanation as to why athletes are able to
become an epiphenomenalist while on court. In othercarry out a procedure, but later on are unable to give
words, they must be able to view their thoughts as aan explanation as to how they managed to do it. In
by-product of the physical activity in which they areother words, there was no 'what it is like experience?',
engaging in. Just as steam is a by-product of boilingso elaboration becomes difficult.
water, thoughts should be allowed to drift away likeThe tennis player would also not be able to articulate
steam evaporating in the air. As a tennis-playingthe experience of a single on-court item, he/she was
zombie the athlete has been trained in the physicalbecoming increasingly unaware of their environment
requirements and specialized techniques needed tobecause they were in a non-reflective state of mind.
play tennis at its highest level. Elite players don't needWe could ask said player, " was it a satisfying
or want the distractions of, 'what it is like?' experiencesexperience playing in the zone?" No doubt they would
while playing. Some athletes have shown frustrationanswer in the affirmative, but this is only upon reflection
with such experiences and have claimed that theafter the match. They don't actually think, or more to
conscious mind is a hindrance rather than a help whenthe point, don't try and think, 'this is fun' while they are
trying to perform at an optimal level. Instead they tryplaying. Once a player starts reflecting on what is
for a performance brought on by adequately reactinghappening, there is a danger of slipping out of the zone
to a situation without the need to think about whatbecause they are having a, 'what it is like?' experience.
they are doing. They want their actions to be largelyThe "zone' or 'flow' experience is a universal state of
automatic.mind which is best described as a state of mind which
I am of the opinion that elite tennis players who canlacks reflective awareness. It has been stated that a
achieve this are for all intention purposes, tennis-playinglack of reflective awareness enables the athlete to a
zombies. But how are sentient beings able to stopdirect link between perception and action thus by
reflecting and become zombies while they are playingpassing the cognitive process. The advantage of
sport? Elite players don't have to reflect upon how toby-passing the cognitive process would be that it
play their shots. Long practice sessions and mayallows for a more rapid processing of environmental
matches have ensured players don't have stop andinformation. (Hardy et. al., 2003) Like the tennis playing
think how to produce a serve or backhand. In fact,zombie a better performance is possible through doing
once committed to "muscle memory" the mechanicswhat is necessary and efficient without having to think
can be difficult to change.about it.
This however does not solve the problem of 'what it isAn obvious criticism of the tennis playing zombie is that
like?' experiences. No matter how well drilled a playershuman players might need to change their pregame
shots are they can still suffer from nerves and anxietystrategy while actually playing. In other words, if things
which will inhibit a zone like performance. What isare not going to plan they might have to monitor what
required is a "blank" or "neutral" mind which will facilitateis happening and then think about implementing a
a direct link between perception and action. Thedifferent strategy. However, this is not necessarily the
automatic performance of an action without the needcase. Sports psychologists make us of hierarchical
for cognition is know in sports psychology as anmodel of cognitive control to explain automatic motor
ecological model of performance (Hardy et.al., 2003). Iperformance without the need for conscious
am of the opinion that a blank mind satisfies theawareness. The idea is that higher level processing
ecological criteria even though there is no evidence toindirectly controls lower order operations. When
support this claim. The reason for this may lie in theengaged in sporting competition athletes do think about
fact it doesn't seem possible for anyone to play sportthings from time to time, if only because they are
without drawing on their cognitive powers. In otherhuman. However, for most of the time they trust their
words, it is impossible to play with a blank mind. Or ismotor system to do what is necessary in terms of
it?mechanics. It seems that necessary adjustments are
The Tennis Playing Zombie Argumentimplemented as a motor response rather than a
Tennis player (A) dislikes tennis player (B), both on andcognitive response.(Hardy et.al.,2003). Interestingly
off the court. They are drawn to play each other in aenough this is in spite of the fact that they come from
singles match. The first time (A) comes to the net (B)higher level processing.
sizes the opportunity and drives the ball straight at him.Conclusion
(A) becomes very angry because he sees this as aThe arguments presented thus far points to the fact
deliberate attempt by (B) to injure him. Player (A)that it is possible to play tennis without recourse to
begins to boil over with rage; it is all he can do to stopcognition, provided the mind can be induced into a
himself jumping the net and having it out with (B). As aneutral or blank state while actually undertaking the
result his skills are dramatically affected and he losesperformance.A blank mind appears to be able to
the match.channel higher order perception into controlling motor
If we were to as (A) 'what it feels like' to play (B), heaction without a recourse to cognition. Such an
might liken it to a war. He doesn't like the ball beingachievement I believe is conducive to achieving a
driven straight at him and he can't stand the smirk on"zone' or "flow" response. Passive on court meditation
(B's) face when he hit's a winner past him. Next weekis only one of any number of way that it is possible to
(A) plays (C) in a game of singles and exactly theinduce a blank state of mind. No doubt athletes have
same thing happens when (A) finds himself at the net.their own methods that they have developed over
Because (A) believes (rightly or wrongly) that (C) is histime.The advantage of by-passing the cognitive
friend, he interprets this as an accident and both areprocess is exactly the same advantage afforded to
able to laugh the incident off. (A) has a very differentany zombie. Zombies can't get nervous or anxious
experience, given the similarity of situations. Theregardless of how stressful a situation may seem to a
scenario thus far suggests that, 'what it is like to be inhuman. Zombies are shielded from stress and anxiety
a situation?' is very much a subjective experience.by their lack of ability to reflect upon a situation.
However, this is about to change dramatically for theAthletes who shield themselves from such
embattled tennis player.experiences by a blank mind approach give
The next time (A) has to play (B) again, he knows thatthemselves the best opportunity to 'cross-over' into the
he should easily beat his opponent, but fears thatzone.
personal feelings will get in the way of a strongReferences
performance. Indeed, there appears no way he canHardy, L, Jones, G and Gould, D. (2003) Understanding
win. (A) laments his predicament into the sympatheticPsychological Preparation for Sport: Theory and
ear of (C). As luck would have it (C) is an expert inPractice of Elite Performers, Chichester; John Willy and
mindfulness meditation and suggests to (A) that heSons, pp.179-180.
needs to change the way he thinks on the tennis court.