Is Federer All Alone in his Style of Play?

p>Everyone is marvelled at Federer's fantastic recordHe uses your pace against you. If you take pace off,
but it is no surprise if you think not to far back at Peteso that he can't use your pace, he can step around
Sampras dominance and John McEnroe's, who alsoand hurt you with the forehand. Just the amount of
played great all round games.options he has to get around any particular stage of
One of the characteristics that separates thesethe match where maybe something's out of sync is --
players from others is their uncanny ability to performseems to be endless."
at their best under extreme pressure and win the "big"You know, that's my point, I was safe for a long time
points" especially at the "Big Four" (the Grand Slams).out there just hitting a dumpy second serve to the
They all have or had big weapons, the courage andbackhand and getting into the point. Then at any point
clarity of mind to use them when they most neededhe can decide, "Well, I want to make you worry about
them or when they mentally, would/will do the greatestthat." He had the breeze on his back. He just stayed
damage to their opponents.through that ball and hit it up the line."
For example, in the last US Open Björn Borg"You know, and then the next couple points, because
played, John McEnroe used his creativity as one of hishe has -- you know he's going to step up, you have
weapons against Borg.that little extra pressure to do a little bit more with the
The match was at a very tight crucial moment withball, to push it through the wind, and to get it deep
Borg realizing that he would not win from the baselinebecause you don't want to leave anything hanging
and feeling pressured to come to the net. Borg did justagainst him on either wing. And, you know, you make a
that with a great approach shot up the line to John'scouple errors because you're trying to play too good.
forehand, which McEnroe responded with a weakAnd then just for good measure he did it at 6-1 in the
cross court passing, Borg volleyed solid up the line fortiebreaker."
what should have been a winner and moved in closer"So anything that you're trying to execute out there
to the net for the kill. McEnroe somehow managed toonly lasts for a period of time till he makes the
get to the ball and strike an incredible backhand topspinadjustment. Then you have to change it. All the while,
lob over the head of a surprised, flat footed, stunnedeverything you're planning on doing, you have to do
Bjorn Borg! After that there were many interestingwell and you have to do it start to finish. So that's, you
points in that match, but that lob took the soul out ofknow -- you can only say it so many ways. You
Borg and showed him that all doors to US Openknow, that's too good."
heaven were shut! When Borg walked back to the"Q. You said in order to beat him, something needs to
baseline he knew he had lost the match and not muchbe off. Was something off in his game at one point
long after that tournament he retired from professionaltonight?
tennis.AA: No. You just got to do it for a long time. I mean,
Pete Sampras did the same kind of mental damageyou know, this is not -- a match is a complicated thing.
during his vomiting session to Corretja at the US OpenThere are a lot of ebbs and flows in it. There's a lot of
96, in his crying session to Courier at the Australian-- but ultimately, the person that brings the most the
Open 95 and in a number of different occasions to themost amount of times, you know, is going towin that.
likes of Ivan Lendl, Boris Becker, Agassi, Rafter,He just brings a lot all the time for all the options he
Henman and others.has. And while there are periods that you can have
Petes greatest weapon was his second serve, youhim on the fence, his options when he's on the fence is
may say, "What about the first?" Pete's second servebetter than most, better than most."
was what allowed him to go left and right for aces"You have to respect not just his abilities, but you also
with his first serve at the "big points". So sure he washave to respect what goes into all the pieces that
that he would not miss his second service as well asmake him the factor he is, you know. I mean, and that's
of the quality of it, that he had no fear of histhe mindset. It is the focus. It is the,you know, the
opponents return! This great confidence in his secondknowing when to play, when not to play. It's pulling out
service, allowed him the luxury to even ace hisof tournaments as you prepare to peak for other
challengers with his second service in the climax oftournaments. You know, he's made a lot of good
pressure. Needless to say, this was disheartening,decisions, and he certainly is maximizing all the arsenal
frustrating and mind boggling to his despondentthat he has. And I can't say it surprises me because I
adversaries.don't know him, but it certainly amazes me."
In 1990 in Milano I saw the begining of the effective useHaving read that, tennis is only a game and you are
of such weapons, when Pete threatened Lendl into awhat you allow your opponent to do. Brad Gilbert was
3rd set, which was continued in Philadelphia where heBoris (Boom-Boom) Becker black sheep and in the
defeated a baffled Agassi shaking his head, changingsummer of 1989 he humilliated the tennis elite by
from side to side barely touching a ball on the return.winning 6 ATP tournaments and beating almost every
Two matches later there was more of the same intop ten player. Without a powerful forehand, but with
the final against Andres Gomez. At year's end usingthe ability to draw great players into his game, make
similar tactics and weapons Pete culminated histhem lose confidence in their shot making, raising their
season with the crown at the US Open.unforced error quota to unsustainable levels and
Federer today with his "unique" game (a throw back toproducing some superb passing shots. Brad with very
the 60's and 70's tennis) demonstrates that the allintelligent tactics, drew incredible wins from Great
around game is a tremendous challenge for today'sChampions that on paper were vastely better then
players, because a large majority of them are totallyhim.
inept at dealing with the short cross slice backhand asIn the past there were a few players capable of doing
well as the low slice on their forehands (due tothe same to the very best of their era:
extreme grips), which makes them prey to attacksRamanathan Krishnan (not to be confused with his son
and winners! At his best Roger's refined "repertoire"Ramesh), Willy Alvarez (famous Coach from the
can drive the most stall worth Hewitt, Ferrero,Sanchez boys), Corrado Barazutti and an infamous
Nalbandian, Gaudio, Gonzales, Nadal into submission, ifZuleta just to name a few. These players made many
not into total embarrassment!of the very best look meek, despondent and
This implicates the possibility that many players of thefrustrated in defeat.
past e.g. Rod Laver, Lew Hoad, Ken Rosewall, RoyAdjustments are being made by players and coaches
Emerson, John Newcombe , Ilie Nastase, Johnthat will make tennis ever more interesting. Basel Open
McEnroe, just to mention a few, would be a great2005 gave me an insight on what's to come and it
challenge to many of today's top hard hitting players.looks as if in the future tennis will be a much more
To substantiate my theory, in Davis Cup aroundexciting and varied game.
1988(?) maybe later...an ailing unfit and "old" VictorPower is important but power is not all in tennis! Tennis
Pecci, a much lesser player then the names above,is a game of skills, tactics/strategies, fitness, speed,
demonstrated the vulnerabilities of a young Michaelintelligence, quick thinking, creativity, therefore opening
Chang and "modern tennis". Later on Jim Grab mainlythe possibility for many of the players from the past to
a doubles specialist did the same by neutralizing Changprevail on some surfaces and not on others against
with the soft slice and attacking with low slices downthe likes of Federer, Sampras, Agassi, Courier, Nadal
the line or up the center of the court. Basicallyand many others.
humiliating Michael into losing to a guy with slowMartina Navratilova, a great champion, epithomizes the
movement "soft" hands but with solid volleys.ultimate learner of the game, once said:
This does not mean that today's players are worthless"Why," she was asked, "are you still doing this at 46?"
or their games are stupid. Today's top players are"Life. We're lucky to be here. It's about learning and our
great like in any other era. The game changedtime is limited. I'm still learning, to do better, still studying
tremendously; extreme grips, power, topspin, thestrategy. I'm technically better now than I was in my
cross-court percentage play and waist level bouncingheyday. You know I hit a shot against [Jana] Novotna
balls became common place, nevertheless theat Wimbledon last year when I played. After the game
challenge of a low slice ball, a good mix of attacksshe said: 'What was that, I've never seen it before?' I
from a creative Roger Federer has just provensaid I only learned to play it a few days ago. The key
overwhelming to them.was the grip but you never stop learning the game.
Today's coaches and aspiring players should definitelyYou have to have talent, but if you haven't the heart
follow the lead from Roger Federer and adopt histo explore the talent it's all a waste of time."
game and refined tactics, it will make for a much more....I almost forgot to say, Federer is not alone in his style
varied and challenging future breed of tennis playersof play, he is in very good company with the likes of:
as well as far more exciting game to watch for theRod Laver, Lew Hoad, Ken Rosewall, Roy Emerson,
spectator's.John Newcombe, Ilie Nastase, John McEnroe, Boris
Agassi in an interview about Federer, sheds some lightBecker, Stefan Edberg, Pete Sampras, Pancho
on the challenges Federer's all round game presents toGonzales and many other greats!
baseliners and aggressive baseliners.Hope you are willing to develop your talent, enjoy "The
AA: "But, you know, with that being said, he hit anGame".
inside-out winner at 30-Love, 4-2 in the third set thatCopyright © 1999-2005 Tenniscruz.com®. All
found the line. He hit a few up the line. He hits thatrights reserved.
short chip, moves you forward, moves you back.